Walker Foster prides itself on its empathy and support for its clients that encounter a dispute with their neighbours over the boundary or fence line of the adjoining property.
Research by Churchill Home Insurance reveals nearly 11 million people, almost a fifth of UK homeowners (23 per cent), have been involved in a property boundary issue with a neighbour.
In the last 12 months alone, 6.6 million (14 per cent) homeowners have argued over boundaries of their property.
Boundary disputes can be broadly categorised into four main headings:
Otherwise, rational people can become bitterly entrenched over a perceived encroachment of possibly a few centimetres only and in some circumstances will spend thousands of pounds seeking to protect a slither of land, the value of which can be significantly less than the costs involved to resolve the dispute.
Relations between the neighbours can disintegrate and once the dispute has been resolved, the realisation that unless one party moves, they remain neighbours with their antagonist and those relations do not fully recover.
So how does one not become involved in a protracted and costly dispute with one’s neighbour?
Walker Foster would encourage a potential participant to a boundary dispute to speak with one’s neighbour and seek to negotiate a compromise.
Perhaps the neighbour had not known that a tree had overgrown, a fence had become dilapidated, or that access had become restricted.
If an amicable solution can be achieved, then this will save both time and money and will preserve your relationship with your neighbour, and perhaps even enhance it.
If, however, an agreement cannot be reached, then what can one do?
Walker Foster would strongly encourage that you talk to your neighbour in the first instance; face to face, if you can, and make a note of what is agreed. It is very often best to find a compromise.
It could help you to keep a good relationship with your neighbour and it will undoubtedly be cheaper than paying a solicitor to resolve the disagreement.
In the event that the neighbours cannot reach a resolution, then there are various options available to establish the correct boundary line.
Some people rely on plans that are held at HM Land Registry, but one should be very careful on such plans.
The reasons for exercising caution to this approach are primarily threefold:
If you are inclined to purchase the title plans for your property, it might be prudent to also purchase the title plans for the neighbouring property. They might be different to each other!
The most useful document to determine the boundary is invariably the original conveyance that separated the land. This will need to be interpreted both legally and with reference to the physical features of the land at the material time.
The instruction of a surveyor can be very useful, especially if agreed by both parties and both parties will accept the evaluation of the surveyor as binding.
If the boundary line still cannot be agreed, then mediation should be considered. Mediation involves a neutral third party helping the parties to negotiate and reach a settlement.
The process can have a more practical than legal focus, and it can be arranged relatively quickly and can save the parties a considerable amount of money in legal costs.
Should mediation not be successful, then it might become necessary to contemplate relief from the judicial process. Litigation should, however, be a last resort.
A considerable period of time might elapse before the matter is listed before a judge, and once it is the judge might prefer a boundary line that neither neighbour contemplated, and consequently both parties remain dissatisfied but for different reasons.
The costs associated with boundary disputes can be substantial. It is therefore important that all avenues are explored and that advice relative to your own particular circumstances is received.
Walker Foster has a reputation for helping clients with boundary disputes and within its dispute resolution team are not only lawyers but also qualified mediators, trained with the ability to negotiate and explore alternative solutions.
This article is intended as guidance only and should not be construed as legal advice. Each dispute is resolved with reference to its own particular merits and facts. For further help and guidance on your particular issue, please contact.
Luca Angarano, Chartered Legal Executive: la@walkerfoster.com or call 01756 700200
Nick Dent, Chartered Legal Executive: nd@walkerfoster.com or call 01609 711158
27 Riddings Road, Ilkley, LS29 9LX
1 High Street, Settle, BD24 9EX
63 Kirkgate, Silsden, Keighley, BD20 0PB
3 High Street, Skipton, BD23 1AA
First Floor, 7 Victoria Avenue, Harrogate, HG1 1EQ
Century House, Northallerton, DL6 2XQ
Many people assume that only someone named in a Will can challenge it. In reality, a person does not always need to be included as a beneficiary to contest a Will. In certain circumstances, someone who has been left out may still have legal standing to bring a claim.
When a person dies, their estate will be administered by a person or persons named as ‘executors’ in their will, or, in cases where they did not leave one, by anyone who has the highest standing to do so (which largely matches the rules of who benefits under a so-called intestacy). These individuals are also called personal representatives (PRs).
When a dispute arises between two parties, it’s not as simple as going straight to court. Before formal legal proceedings can begin, there are pre-action conduct requirements that must be followed.
Many business owners encounter commercial disputes at some stage, as disagreements are a natural part of running a business. In most cases, issues can be addressed and resolved internally through open communication and practical problem-solving.
